The China Mail - Market-based schemes not reducing deforestation, poverty: report

USD -
AED 3.673015
AFN 71.999821
ALL 86.650078
AMD 390.940493
ANG 1.80229
AOA 917.495625
ARS 1092.613713
AUD 1.553565
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.712686
BAM 1.720686
BBD 2.017877
BDT 121.428069
BGN 1.72105
BHD 0.376865
BIF 2930
BMD 1
BND 1.312071
BOB 6.906563
BRL 5.808095
BSD 0.999437
BTN 85.314611
BWP 13.77569
BYN 3.270808
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007496
CAD 1.37972
CDF 2876.999857
CHF 0.807905
CLF 0.02506
CLP 961.649738
CNY 7.3039
CNH 7.30991
COP 4277
CRC 502.269848
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.382409
CZK 21.689904
DJF 177.720028
DKK 6.47185
DOP 60.50998
DZD 131.623946
EGP 51.111564
ERN 15
ETB 133.023649
EUR 0.86663
FJD 2.24575
FKP 0.747304
GBP 0.74536
GEL 2.745007
GGP 0.747304
GHS 15.560441
GIP 0.747304
GMD 71.496816
GNF 8655.508288
GTQ 7.698128
GYD 209.656701
HKD 7.75874
HNL 25.849387
HRK 6.527403
HTG 130.419482
HUF 352.904031
IDR 16855.25
ILS 3.72496
IMP 0.747304
INR 85.075505
IQD 1310
IRR 42124.999662
ISK 125.759547
JEP 0.747304
JMD 157.965583
JOD 0.709296
JPY 139.953497
KES 129.750453
KGS 87.233503
KHR 4014.999764
KMF 433.497406
KPW 900.060306
KRW 1418.659713
KWD 0.305991
KYD 0.832893
KZT 523.173564
LAK 21687.500738
LBP 89599.999867
LKR 298.915224
LRD 199.974986
LSL 18.856894
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.470496
MAD 9.274978
MDL 17.289555
MGA 4552.892736
MKD 53.362418
MMK 2099.542767
MNT 3539.927763
MOP 7.990393
MRU 39.435529
MUR 44.510221
MVR 15.398613
MWK 1735.999848
MXN 19.661835
MYR 4.377503
MZN 63.905002
NAD 18.856894
NGN 1604.240086
NIO 36.775056
NOK 10.330875
NPR 136.503202
NZD 1.660505
OMR 0.385028
PAB 0.999437
PEN 3.76303
PGK 4.133235
PHP 56.584504
PKR 280.603439
PLN 3.702529
PYG 7999.894426
QAR 3.640598
RON 4.314297
RSD 103.137317
RUB 81.484509
RWF 1415
SAR 3.75162
SBD 8.326764
SCR 14.230564
SDG 600.50203
SEK 9.506795
SGD 1.304441
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.774969
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.501654
SRD 37.150296
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745073
SYP 13001.950927
SZL 18.820234
THB 33.141497
TJS 10.733754
TMT 3.5
TND 2.988038
TOP 2.342099
TRY 38.258697
TTD 6.781391
TWD 32.458498
TZS 2684.999687
UAH 41.417687
UGX 3663.55798
UYU 41.913007
UZS 12914.999764
VES 80.85863
VND 25915
VUV 120.379945
WST 2.787305
XAF 577.111964
XAG 0.030436
XAU 0.000286
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.709959
XOF 575.000004
XPF 102.775034
YER 245.249652
ZAR 18.675871
ZMK 9001.197294
ZMW 28.458439
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    63.5900

    63.59

    +100%

  • AZN

    -0.6900

    66.9

    -1.03%

  • CMSC

    -0.1100

    21.71

    -0.51%

  • RYCEF

    0.0200

    9.31

    +0.21%

  • NGG

    0.7900

    72.9

    +1.08%

  • BCC

    -2.6700

    90.8

    -2.94%

  • GSK

    0.5200

    36.45

    +1.43%

  • SCS

    -0.3400

    9.42

    -3.61%

  • BTI

    0.1800

    42.55

    +0.42%

  • RIO

    0.3000

    58.47

    +0.51%

  • VOD

    -0.0800

    9.23

    -0.87%

  • RELX

    -0.1300

    52.07

    -0.25%

  • JRI

    -0.2700

    12.13

    -2.23%

  • BCE

    0.3400

    22.38

    +1.52%

  • CMSD

    -0.1400

    21.82

    -0.64%

  • BP

    -0.2400

    28.08

    -0.85%

Market-based schemes not reducing deforestation, poverty: report
Market-based schemes not reducing deforestation, poverty: report / Photo: © AFP

Market-based schemes not reducing deforestation, poverty: report

Market-based approaches to forest conservation like carbon offsets and deforestation-free certification schemes have largely failed to protect trees or alleviate poverty, according to a major scientific review published on Monday.

Text size:

The global study -- the most comprehensive of its kind to date -- found that trade and finance-driven initiatives had made "limited" progress halting deforestation and in some cases worsened economic inequality.

Drawn from years of academic and field work, the report compiled by the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), a group of 15,000 scientists in 120 countries, will be presented at a high-level UN forum starting Monday.

Its authors urged a "radical rethink" of increasingly popular market-based approaches often promoted as effective at saving forests, curbing global warming and raising living standards in developing nations.

"The evidence does not support the claim of win-wins or triple wins for environment, economy and people often made for market mechanisms as a policy response to environmental problems," said contributing author Maria Brockhaus from the University of Helsinki.

"Rather our cases show that poverty and forest loss both are persistent across different regions of the world... where market mechanisms have been the main policy option for decades," she told AFP by email.

- No accountability -

Since the last IUFRO assessment in 2010, the report noted a rise in complex and overlapping market-based schemes "with financial actors and shareholders more often interested in short-term profits than long-term just and sustainable forest governance".

Its lead author, Constance McDermott from the University of Oxford, said this may not be true of all individual projects "but overall... it's hard to say they've been a rousing success".

The report said a $120 million project in the Democratic Republic of Congo had "reinforced entrenched interests" by restricting local people from forests without addressing logging by powerful extractive businesses.

In Malaysia, indigenous groups promised better livelihoods from a foreign-backed plantation venture on their customary land received no benefit, the report said.

"As both cases show, 'wins' are often gained elsewhere, while the burdens of forest loss, enclosures and forestland conversion are carried locally," said Brockhaus.

In Ghana, deforestation rates had risen despite a slew of sustainable cocoa standards, corporate pledges, and carbon offset projects, while farmers were earning less today than decades ago, said McDermott.

Meanwhile green trade policies imposed by wealthy countries -- like the EU's ban on imports linked to deforestation -- might look good from Brussels but did not consider the knock-on effects, she added.

"There's no accountability. If this doesn't work -- or farmers are pushed off their farm as a result -- it's not going to hurt the person eating chocolate in the UK or Germany," she said.

- 'Radical rethink' -

Despite recent turmoil, carbon markets are projected to grow into a multi-billion-dollar industry as corporations increasingly turn to credits to meet their net-zero climate targets.

Credits are purchased from projects, often in developing nations, that reduce or avoid the release of planet-heating emissions, such as protecting CO2-absorbing rainforests or peat swamps.

Kenya's President William Ruto has called Africa's carbon sinks an "unparalleled economic goldmine" that could generate billions of dollars every year.

But there are growing concerns about how much of that revenue poor communities might expect to see, with unscrupulous actors accused of exploitation.

Brockhaus said market-based approaches may be appealing to policymakers but would not be a solution without also addressing the broader economic and governance challenges around forest management.

"We advocate for a radical rethink," she said.

K.Lam--ThChM