The China Mail - Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 72.000368
ALL 87.274775
AMD 390.940403
ANG 1.80229
AOA 912.000367
ARS 1137.970104
AUD 1.565349
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.720686
BBD 2.017877
BDT 121.428069
BGN 1.721593
BHD 0.376901
BIF 2930
BMD 1
BND 1.312071
BOB 6.906563
BRL 5.808204
BSD 0.999437
BTN 85.314611
BWP 13.77569
BYN 3.270808
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007496
CAD 1.384165
CDF 2877.000362
CHF 0.81849
CLF 0.025203
CLP 967.160396
CNY 7.30391
CNH 7.30369
COP 4310
CRC 502.269848
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.403894
CZK 22.038604
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.56557
DOP 60.503884
DZD 132.56604
EGP 51.126904
ERN 15
ETB 133.023649
EUR 0.879325
FJD 2.283704
FKP 0.753159
GBP 0.753835
GEL 2.740391
GGP 0.753159
GHS 15.56039
GIP 0.753159
GMD 71.503851
GNF 8655.503848
GTQ 7.698128
GYD 209.656701
HKD 7.76252
HNL 25.908819
HRK 6.612104
HTG 130.419482
HUF 359.10504
IDR 16862.9
ILS 3.68395
IMP 0.753159
INR 85.377504
IQD 1310
IRR 42125.000352
ISK 127.590386
JEP 0.753159
JMD 157.965583
JOD 0.709304
JPY 142.17104
KES 129.503801
KGS 87.233504
KHR 4015.00035
KMF 433.503794
KPW 899.977001
KRW 1418.390383
KWD 0.30663
KYD 0.832893
KZT 523.173564
LAK 21630.000349
LBP 89600.000349
LKR 298.915224
LRD 199.975039
LSL 18.856894
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.470381
MAD 9.275039
MDL 17.289555
MGA 4552.892736
MKD 54.091003
MMK 2099.608303
MNT 3548.057033
MOP 7.990393
MRU 39.435529
MUR 45.090378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1736.000345
MXN 19.72174
MYR 4.407504
MZN 63.905039
NAD 18.856894
NGN 1604.703725
NIO 36.775056
NOK 10.481075
NPR 136.503202
NZD 1.685133
OMR 0.384998
PAB 0.999437
PEN 3.763039
PGK 4.133235
PHP 56.712504
PKR 280.603701
PLN 3.762405
PYG 7999.894426
QAR 3.640604
RON 4.378104
RSD 103.137317
RUB 82.174309
RWF 1415
SAR 3.752237
SBD 8.368347
SCR 14.241693
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.63369
SGD 1.310745
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.775038
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.15037
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745073
SYP 13001.68631
SZL 18.820369
THB 33.347038
TJS 10.733754
TMT 3.5
TND 2.988038
TOP 2.342104
TRY 38.12382
TTD 6.781391
TWD 32.524038
TZS 2687.503631
UAH 41.417687
UGX 3663.55798
UYU 41.913007
UZS 12986.521678
VES 80.85863
VND 25870
VUV 121.398575
WST 2.784098
XAF 577.111964
XAG 0.03066
XAU 0.000301
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.717698
XOF 575.000332
XPF 102.775037
YER 245.250363
ZAR 18.840363
ZMK 9001.203587
ZMW 28.458439
ZWL 321.999592
  • VOD

    0.1400

    9.31

    +1.5%

  • GSK

    0.5600

    35.93

    +1.56%

  • NGG

    0.6300

    72.11

    +0.87%

  • RELX

    1.0000

    52.2

    +1.92%

  • BTI

    0.5400

    42.37

    +1.27%

  • RBGPF

    63.5900

    63.59

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1400

    9.36

    -1.5%

  • AZN

    0.5400

    67.59

    +0.8%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    21.82

    +0.18%

  • RIO

    1.0100

    58.17

    +1.74%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    21.96

    +0.18%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    12.4

    +1.29%

  • BCC

    0.7800

    93.47

    +0.83%

  • BP

    0.6600

    28.32

    +2.33%

  • BCE

    0.4200

    22.04

    +1.91%

  • SCS

    0.0500

    9.76

    +0.51%


Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?




As Donald Trump’s second term as U.S. President intensifies global tensions, a volatile mix of international defiance and regional military posturing is emerging, with Poland at the centre of a brewing storm. Amidst protests against Trump’s policies, speculation about nuclear escalation and Poland’s strategic moves against Russia have raised alarms, encapsulated in the provocative phrase circulating among activists and commentators: "We are ready for war." Yet, the reality behind these developments remains grounded in diplomatic friction and military preparedness rather than imminent conflict.

Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025 marked a return to his "America First" stance, including a pledge to reassess U.S. commitments to NATO, announced in a speech in Texas on 25 January. This has sparked outrage across Europe, with protests erupting in cities like Paris and Berlin. On 28 January, French activist Élise Moreau told a crowd of 12,000 outside the U.S. Embassy in Paris—according to police estimates—that "we are ready for war" against Trump’s "disruptive unilateralism." Similar sentiments have echoed in Warsaw, where Polish citizens and officials fear that a weakened NATO could embolden Russia’s ambitions in Eastern Europe.

Poland’s response has been swift and assertive. On 5 March, the Polish Ministry of Defence confirmed the deployment of an additional 10,000 troops to its eastern border with Belarus and Ukraine, citing "heightened Russian military activity" in the region. This followed reports from the Ukrainian General Staff on 2 March that Russia had amassed 50,000 troops near its western frontier, though Moscow denied any aggressive intent. Poland’s Foreign Minister, Anna Kowalska, stated on 7 March that "Warsaw will not wait for threats to materialise," framing the troop surge as a defensive "gambit" to deter Russian advances.

The spectre of nuclear weapons has further inflamed rhetoric. On 10 March, a senior Polish MP from the ruling Law and Justice Party, Janusz Kowalski, suggested in a televised debate that Poland might seek NATO nuclear sharing agreements "if the U.S. wavers." This echoed Trump’s own comments on 8 March in Florida, where he hinted at reconsidering America’s nuclear umbrella over Europe, stating, "Allies need to pay their share, or they’re on their own." No evidence suggests nuclear weapons are currently "on the way" to Poland, but the remarks have fuelled speculation and alarm, amplified by posts on X claiming "nukes" are imminent.

Across the Atlantic, Trump has dismissed the backlash. At a rally in Michigan on 15 March, attended by an estimated 18,000 supporters according to local authorities, he called European critics "freeloaders" and reiterated his intent to renegotiate defence pacts. The White House followed this with a statement on 16 March, asserting that "no changes to NATO’s nuclear posture are under consideration," attempting to quell fears of escalation.

In Europe, reactions vary. Germany’s Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" on 12 March about Poland’s troop movements, urging restraint to avoid provoking Moscow. Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced on 17 March that the alliance would hold emergency talks in Brussels next week to address "cohesion and deterrence" amid Trump’s pressures. Analysts note that Poland’s actions align with its long-standing policy of bolstering its military—its defence budget reached 4% of GDP in 2024, per World Bank data—reflecting fears rooted in Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The "ready for war" rhetoric, while widespread, remains symbolic. Dr. Katarzyna Zielinska, a security expert at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, told this publication, "Poland’s gambit is about deterrence, not aggression. Talk of war—or nukes—is an expression of anxiety, not a plan." Still, the situation is precarious. The International Institute for Strategic Studies reported on 14 March that Russian air patrols near Polish airspace increased by 20% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, heightening regional tensions.

For now, the international rebellion against Trump and Poland’s military stance are distinct but intertwined threads in a broader tapestry of uncertainty. Protests continue—organisers in London are planning a rally for 25 March—while Poland’s border fortifications proceed. Whether these developments signal a genuine slide towards conflict or a recalibration of global alliances remains unclear. What is certain is that Trump’s shadow, and Russia’s looming presence, have set the stage for a critical test of resolve in the months ahead.