The China Mail - Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

USD -
AED 3.672988
AFN 71.999888
ALL 87.274775
AMD 390.940244
ANG 1.80229
AOA 911.999871
ARS 1137.970099
AUD 1.565349
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.69954
BAM 1.720686
BBD 2.017877
BDT 121.428069
BGN 1.721593
BHD 0.376901
BIF 2930
BMD 1
BND 1.312071
BOB 6.906563
BRL 5.808202
BSD 0.999437
BTN 85.314611
BWP 13.77569
BYN 3.270808
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007496
CAD 1.384165
CDF 2876.999556
CHF 0.81849
CLF 0.025203
CLP 967.160089
CNY 7.295699
CNH 7.29796
COP 4310
CRC 502.269848
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.396363
CZK 22.038601
DJF 177.719712
DKK 6.56557
DOP 60.507442
DZD 132.565995
EGP 51.1269
ERN 15
ETB 133.023649
EUR 0.879325
FJD 2.283695
FKP 0.754982
GBP 0.753835
GEL 2.740148
GGP 0.754982
GHS 15.560323
GIP 0.754982
GMD 71.500376
GNF 8655.502269
GTQ 7.698128
GYD 209.656701
HKD 7.762955
HNL 25.908819
HRK 6.625202
HTG 130.419482
HUF 359.105005
IDR 16862.9
ILS 3.68765
IMP 0.754982
INR 85.377497
IQD 1310
IRR 42125.00013
ISK 127.590329
JEP 0.754982
JMD 157.965583
JOD 0.709299
JPY 142.313976
KES 129.501945
KGS 87.233494
KHR 4015.000189
KMF 433.499323
KPW 900.02464
KRW 1418.389923
KWD 0.30663
KYD 0.832893
KZT 523.173564
LAK 21629.999795
LBP 89600.00007
LKR 298.915224
LRD 199.975041
LSL 18.856894
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.469993
MAD 9.274958
MDL 17.289555
MGA 4552.892736
MKD 54.091003
MMK 2099.136407
MNT 3546.835427
MOP 7.990393
MRU 39.435529
MUR 45.090092
MVR 15.403315
MWK 1735.999971
MXN 19.715415
MYR 4.407503
MZN 63.905011
NAD 18.856894
NGN 1604.700846
NIO 36.775056
NOK 10.47309
NPR 136.503202
NZD 1.686056
OMR 0.384998
PAB 0.999437
PEN 3.763002
PGK 4.133235
PHP 56.712499
PKR 280.597033
PLN 3.762405
PYG 7999.894426
QAR 3.640603
RON 4.378101
RSD 103.137317
RUB 82.174309
RWF 1415
SAR 3.752237
SBD 8.368347
SCR 14.241693
SDG 600.478349
SEK 9.618585
SGD 1.310745
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.77498
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.533153
SRD 37.150249
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745073
SYP 13001.532916
SZL 18.819965
THB 33.347025
TJS 10.733754
TMT 3.5
TND 2.988012
TOP 2.342096
TRY 37.954995
TTD 6.781391
TWD 32.524002
TZS 2687.503045
UAH 41.417687
UGX 3663.55798
UYU 41.913007
UZS 12986.521678
VES 80.85863
VND 25870
VUV 122.55164
WST 2.793746
XAF 577.111964
XAG 0.03066
XAU 0.000301
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.717698
XOF 575.00027
XPF 102.775009
YER 245.249665
ZAR 18.800315
ZMK 9001.203789
ZMW 28.458439
ZWL 321.999592
  • BCC

    0.7800

    93.47

    +0.83%

  • NGG

    0.6300

    72.11

    +0.87%

  • GSK

    0.5600

    35.93

    +1.56%

  • AZN

    0.5400

    67.59

    +0.8%

  • BCE

    0.4200

    22.04

    +1.91%

  • BTI

    0.5400

    42.37

    +1.27%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    21.82

    +0.18%

  • RBGPF

    63.5900

    63.59

    +100%

  • SCS

    0.0500

    9.76

    +0.51%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    12.4

    +1.29%

  • RIO

    1.0100

    58.17

    +1.74%

  • VOD

    0.1400

    9.31

    +1.5%

  • RELX

    1.0000

    52.2

    +1.92%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    21.96

    +0.18%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1400

    9.36

    -1.5%

  • BP

    0.6600

    28.32

    +2.33%


Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?




As Donald Trump’s second term as U.S. President intensifies global tensions, a volatile mix of international defiance and regional military posturing is emerging, with Poland at the centre of a brewing storm. Amidst protests against Trump’s policies, speculation about nuclear escalation and Poland’s strategic moves against Russia have raised alarms, encapsulated in the provocative phrase circulating among activists and commentators: "We are ready for war." Yet, the reality behind these developments remains grounded in diplomatic friction and military preparedness rather than imminent conflict.

Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025 marked a return to his "America First" stance, including a pledge to reassess U.S. commitments to NATO, announced in a speech in Texas on 25 January. This has sparked outrage across Europe, with protests erupting in cities like Paris and Berlin. On 28 January, French activist Élise Moreau told a crowd of 12,000 outside the U.S. Embassy in Paris—according to police estimates—that "we are ready for war" against Trump’s "disruptive unilateralism." Similar sentiments have echoed in Warsaw, where Polish citizens and officials fear that a weakened NATO could embolden Russia’s ambitions in Eastern Europe.

Poland’s response has been swift and assertive. On 5 March, the Polish Ministry of Defence confirmed the deployment of an additional 10,000 troops to its eastern border with Belarus and Ukraine, citing "heightened Russian military activity" in the region. This followed reports from the Ukrainian General Staff on 2 March that Russia had amassed 50,000 troops near its western frontier, though Moscow denied any aggressive intent. Poland’s Foreign Minister, Anna Kowalska, stated on 7 March that "Warsaw will not wait for threats to materialise," framing the troop surge as a defensive "gambit" to deter Russian advances.

The spectre of nuclear weapons has further inflamed rhetoric. On 10 March, a senior Polish MP from the ruling Law and Justice Party, Janusz Kowalski, suggested in a televised debate that Poland might seek NATO nuclear sharing agreements "if the U.S. wavers." This echoed Trump’s own comments on 8 March in Florida, where he hinted at reconsidering America’s nuclear umbrella over Europe, stating, "Allies need to pay their share, or they’re on their own." No evidence suggests nuclear weapons are currently "on the way" to Poland, but the remarks have fuelled speculation and alarm, amplified by posts on X claiming "nukes" are imminent.

Across the Atlantic, Trump has dismissed the backlash. At a rally in Michigan on 15 March, attended by an estimated 18,000 supporters according to local authorities, he called European critics "freeloaders" and reiterated his intent to renegotiate defence pacts. The White House followed this with a statement on 16 March, asserting that "no changes to NATO’s nuclear posture are under consideration," attempting to quell fears of escalation.

In Europe, reactions vary. Germany’s Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" on 12 March about Poland’s troop movements, urging restraint to avoid provoking Moscow. Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced on 17 March that the alliance would hold emergency talks in Brussels next week to address "cohesion and deterrence" amid Trump’s pressures. Analysts note that Poland’s actions align with its long-standing policy of bolstering its military—its defence budget reached 4% of GDP in 2024, per World Bank data—reflecting fears rooted in Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The "ready for war" rhetoric, while widespread, remains symbolic. Dr. Katarzyna Zielinska, a security expert at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, told this publication, "Poland’s gambit is about deterrence, not aggression. Talk of war—or nukes—is an expression of anxiety, not a plan." Still, the situation is precarious. The International Institute for Strategic Studies reported on 14 March that Russian air patrols near Polish airspace increased by 20% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, heightening regional tensions.

For now, the international rebellion against Trump and Poland’s military stance are distinct but intertwined threads in a broader tapestry of uncertainty. Protests continue—organisers in London are planning a rally for 25 March—while Poland’s border fortifications proceed. Whether these developments signal a genuine slide towards conflict or a recalibration of global alliances remains unclear. What is certain is that Trump’s shadow, and Russia’s looming presence, have set the stage for a critical test of resolve in the months ahead.