The China Mail - Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

USD -
AED 3.673035
AFN 72.04561
ALL 90.426454
AMD 393.432155
ANG 1.790208
AOA 915.999924
ARS 1083.599498
AUD 1.66334
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.701015
BAM 1.784082
BBD 2.031653
BDT 122.253136
BGN 1.784082
BHD 0.379293
BIF 2990.649943
BMD 1
BND 1.345222
BOB 6.952794
BRL 5.845504
BSD 1.006157
BTN 85.842645
BWP 14.014139
BYN 3.292862
BYR 19600
BZD 2.021163
CAD 1.424795
CDF 2872.999736
CHF 0.85735
CLF 0.0249
CLP 955.540206
CNY 7.28155
CNH 7.32536
COP 4181.71
CRC 509.007982
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 100.583808
CZK 23.098975
DJF 179.18358
DKK 6.823425
DOP 63.5439
DZD 133.249715
EGP 51.028604
ERN 15
ETB 132.622212
EUR 0.914405
FJD 2.314897
FKP 0.774531
GBP 0.77728
GEL 2.74987
GGP 0.774531
GHS 15.595895
GIP 0.774531
GMD 71.501076
GNF 8707.867731
GTQ 7.765564
GYD 210.508552
HKD 7.76873
HNL 25.744128
HRK 6.889703
HTG 131.657925
HUF 371.790065
IDR 17235.35
ILS 3.743125
IMP 0.774531
INR 85.8117
IQD 1318.129989
IRR 42100.000281
ISK 132.505152
JEP 0.774531
JMD 158.686431
JOD 0.708897
JPY 146.496959
KES 130.04979
KGS 86.768797
KHR 4028.278221
KMF 450.554804
KPW 900.000008
KRW 1466.719508
KWD 0.30779
KYD 0.838495
KZT 510.166477
LAK 21794.298746
LBP 90155.803877
LKR 298.335234
LRD 201.240593
LSL 19.187412
LTL 2.952741
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.866591
MAD 9.582851
MDL 17.779704
MGA 4665.906499
MKD 56.132269
MMK 2099.341751
MNT 3508.091945
MOP 8.055188
MRU 40.127708
MUR 44.670165
MVR 15.400028
MWK 1744.766249
MXN 20.666045
MYR 4.468496
MZN 63.909993
NAD 19.187412
NGN 1545.890061
NIO 37.026226
NOK 10.878835
NPR 137.348233
NZD 1.797155
OMR 0.384721
PAB 1.006249
PEN 3.697332
PGK 4.15325
PHP 57.352018
PKR 282.466317
PLN 3.90801
PYG 8066.59065
QAR 3.667868
RON 4.551397
RSD 106.86431
RUB 85.041789
RWF 1450.034208
SAR 3.752799
SBD 8.316332
SCR 14.350104
SDG 600.503622
SEK 10.121045
SGD 1.348535
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.75025
SLL 20969.501083
SOS 575.051311
SRD 36.646502
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.804561
SYP 13001.836564
SZL 19.194527
THB 34.632028
TJS 10.95252
TMT 3.5
TND 3.081231
TOP 2.342097
TRY 38.006398
TTD 6.815964
TWD 33.2125
TZS 2691.722018
UAH 41.414641
UGX 3677.993158
UYU 42.563284
UZS 13000.684151
VES 70.161515
VND 25800
VUV 122.117516
WST 2.799576
XAF 598.364424
XAG 0.032973
XAU 0.00033
XCD 2.702551
XDR 0.744173
XOF 598.364424
XPF 108.789054
YER 245.649854
ZAR 19.275003
ZMK 9001.198309
ZMW 27.896921
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    -0.0600

    10.68

    -0.56%

  • RELX

    -3.2800

    48.16

    -6.81%

  • BTI

    -2.0600

    39.86

    -5.17%

  • CMSD

    0.1600

    22.83

    +0.7%

  • GSK

    -2.4800

    36.53

    -6.79%

  • NGG

    -3.4600

    65.93

    -5.25%

  • RYCEF

    -1.5500

    8.25

    -18.79%

  • RIO

    -3.7600

    54.67

    -6.88%

  • BCE

    0.0500

    22.71

    +0.22%

  • RBGPF

    69.0200

    69.02

    +100%

  • VOD

    -0.8700

    8.5

    -10.24%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    22.29

    +0.13%

  • JRI

    -0.8600

    11.96

    -7.19%

  • AZN

    -5.4600

    68.46

    -7.98%

  • BCC

    0.8100

    95.44

    +0.85%

  • BP

    -2.9600

    28.38

    -10.43%


Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?




As Donald Trump’s second term as U.S. President intensifies global tensions, a volatile mix of international defiance and regional military posturing is emerging, with Poland at the centre of a brewing storm. Amidst protests against Trump’s policies, speculation about nuclear escalation and Poland’s strategic moves against Russia have raised alarms, encapsulated in the provocative phrase circulating among activists and commentators: "We are ready for war." Yet, the reality behind these developments remains grounded in diplomatic friction and military preparedness rather than imminent conflict.

Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025 marked a return to his "America First" stance, including a pledge to reassess U.S. commitments to NATO, announced in a speech in Texas on 25 January. This has sparked outrage across Europe, with protests erupting in cities like Paris and Berlin. On 28 January, French activist Élise Moreau told a crowd of 12,000 outside the U.S. Embassy in Paris—according to police estimates—that "we are ready for war" against Trump’s "disruptive unilateralism." Similar sentiments have echoed in Warsaw, where Polish citizens and officials fear that a weakened NATO could embolden Russia’s ambitions in Eastern Europe.

Poland’s response has been swift and assertive. On 5 March, the Polish Ministry of Defence confirmed the deployment of an additional 10,000 troops to its eastern border with Belarus and Ukraine, citing "heightened Russian military activity" in the region. This followed reports from the Ukrainian General Staff on 2 March that Russia had amassed 50,000 troops near its western frontier, though Moscow denied any aggressive intent. Poland’s Foreign Minister, Anna Kowalska, stated on 7 March that "Warsaw will not wait for threats to materialise," framing the troop surge as a defensive "gambit" to deter Russian advances.

The spectre of nuclear weapons has further inflamed rhetoric. On 10 March, a senior Polish MP from the ruling Law and Justice Party, Janusz Kowalski, suggested in a televised debate that Poland might seek NATO nuclear sharing agreements "if the U.S. wavers." This echoed Trump’s own comments on 8 March in Florida, where he hinted at reconsidering America’s nuclear umbrella over Europe, stating, "Allies need to pay their share, or they’re on their own." No evidence suggests nuclear weapons are currently "on the way" to Poland, but the remarks have fuelled speculation and alarm, amplified by posts on X claiming "nukes" are imminent.

Across the Atlantic, Trump has dismissed the backlash. At a rally in Michigan on 15 March, attended by an estimated 18,000 supporters according to local authorities, he called European critics "freeloaders" and reiterated his intent to renegotiate defence pacts. The White House followed this with a statement on 16 March, asserting that "no changes to NATO’s nuclear posture are under consideration," attempting to quell fears of escalation.

In Europe, reactions vary. Germany’s Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" on 12 March about Poland’s troop movements, urging restraint to avoid provoking Moscow. Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced on 17 March that the alliance would hold emergency talks in Brussels next week to address "cohesion and deterrence" amid Trump’s pressures. Analysts note that Poland’s actions align with its long-standing policy of bolstering its military—its defence budget reached 4% of GDP in 2024, per World Bank data—reflecting fears rooted in Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The "ready for war" rhetoric, while widespread, remains symbolic. Dr. Katarzyna Zielinska, a security expert at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, told this publication, "Poland’s gambit is about deterrence, not aggression. Talk of war—or nukes—is an expression of anxiety, not a plan." Still, the situation is precarious. The International Institute for Strategic Studies reported on 14 March that Russian air patrols near Polish airspace increased by 20% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, heightening regional tensions.

For now, the international rebellion against Trump and Poland’s military stance are distinct but intertwined threads in a broader tapestry of uncertainty. Protests continue—organisers in London are planning a rally for 25 March—while Poland’s border fortifications proceed. Whether these developments signal a genuine slide towards conflict or a recalibration of global alliances remains unclear. What is certain is that Trump’s shadow, and Russia’s looming presence, have set the stage for a critical test of resolve in the months ahead.