The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672964
AFN 72.000631
ALL 87.274775
AMD 390.939541
ANG 1.80229
AOA 912.00015
ARS 1137.970104
AUD 1.565349
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.691994
BAM 1.720686
BBD 2.017877
BDT 121.428069
BGN 1.721593
BHD 0.376901
BIF 2930
BMD 1
BND 1.312071
BOB 6.906563
BRL 5.8082
BSD 0.999437
BTN 85.314611
BWP 13.77569
BYN 3.270808
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007496
CAD 1.384165
CDF 2876.999784
CHF 0.81849
CLF 0.025203
CLP 967.160095
CNY 7.280379
CNH 7.30371
COP 4310
CRC 502.269848
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.39884
CZK 22.038599
DJF 177.720189
DKK 6.56557
DOP 60.514547
DZD 132.566052
EGP 51.126903
ERN 15
ETB 133.023649
EUR 0.879325
FJD 2.283701
FKP 0.754982
GBP 0.753835
GEL 2.739997
GGP 0.754982
GHS 15.559904
GIP 0.754982
GMD 71.501776
GNF 8655.48207
GTQ 7.698128
GYD 209.656701
HKD 7.763265
HNL 25.908819
HRK 6.6254
HTG 130.419482
HUF 359.104995
IDR 16862.9
ILS 3.68332
IMP 0.754982
INR 85.3775
IQD 1310
IRR 42124.999764
ISK 127.589703
JEP 0.754982
JMD 157.965583
JOD 0.709299
JPY 142.263992
KES 129.499549
KGS 87.233499
KHR 4015.000303
KMF 433.497863
KPW 900.02464
KRW 1418.389877
KWD 0.30663
KYD 0.832893
KZT 523.173564
LAK 21629.999986
LBP 89599.999934
LKR 298.915224
LRD 199.975024
LSL 18.856894
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.470189
MAD 9.274987
MDL 17.289555
MGA 4552.892736
MKD 54.091003
MMK 2099.136407
MNT 3546.835427
MOP 7.990393
MRU 39.435529
MUR 45.089762
MVR 15.406089
MWK 1736.000267
MXN 19.693501
MYR 4.407501
MZN 63.904994
NAD 18.856894
NGN 1604.696513
NIO 36.775056
NOK 10.469055
NPR 136.503202
NZD 1.674355
OMR 0.384998
PAB 0.999437
PEN 3.763018
PGK 4.133235
PHP 56.7125
PKR 280.598067
PLN 3.762405
PYG 7999.894426
QAR 3.640603
RON 4.3781
RSD 103.137317
RUB 82.174309
RWF 1415
SAR 3.752237
SBD 8.368347
SCR 14.241693
SDG 600.505413
SEK 9.61936
SGD 1.310745
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.774985
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.507104
SRD 37.149968
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745073
SYP 13001.532916
SZL 18.819794
THB 33.347046
TJS 10.733754
TMT 3.5
TND 2.988002
TOP 2.342101
TRY 37.954995
TTD 6.781391
TWD 32.524019
TZS 2687.508288
UAH 41.417687
UGX 3663.55798
UYU 41.913007
UZS 12986.521678
VES 80.85863
VND 25870
VUV 122.55164
WST 2.793746
XAF 577.111964
XAG 0.03066
XAU 0.000301
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.717698
XOF 574.999878
XPF 102.774982
YER 245.250173
ZAR 18.809674
ZMK 9001.209021
ZMW 28.458439
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.1400

    63.59

    +0.22%

  • SCS

    0.0500

    9.76

    +0.51%

  • NGG

    0.6300

    72.11

    +0.87%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    21.96

    +0.18%

  • AZN

    0.5400

    67.59

    +0.8%

  • GSK

    0.5600

    35.93

    +1.56%

  • BTI

    0.5400

    42.37

    +1.27%

  • BP

    0.6600

    28.32

    +2.33%

  • RELX

    1.0000

    52.2

    +1.92%

  • RIO

    1.0100

    58.17

    +1.74%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    21.82

    +0.18%

  • BCC

    0.7800

    93.47

    +0.83%

  • BCE

    0.4200

    22.04

    +1.91%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    12.4

    +1.29%

  • VOD

    0.1400

    9.31

    +1.5%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    9.5

    +1.05%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.