The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672991
AFN 71.504229
ALL 89.225029
AMD 391.080368
ANG 1.790208
AOA 918.000417
ARS 1076.298496
AUD 1.608155
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.701618
BAM 1.766007
BBD 2.019991
BDT 121.555243
BGN 1.74239
BHD 0.376958
BIF 2928
BMD 1
BND 1.336909
BOB 6.912867
BRL 5.885197
BSD 1.00047
BTN 86.155305
BWP 14.110285
BYN 3.274009
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009589
CAD 1.395255
CDF 2877.000384
CHF 0.82034
CLF 0.025783
CLP 989.389914
CNY 7.314497
CNH 7.30134
COP 4370.75
CRC 514.411095
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 99.950011
CZK 22.277983
DJF 177.720236
DKK 6.629655
DOP 61.899154
DZD 132.763979
EGP 51.331396
ERN 15
ETB 130.193505
EUR 0.887905
FJD 2.29365
FKP 0.783049
GBP 0.769565
GEL 2.760251
GGP 0.783049
GHS 15.550015
GIP 0.783049
GMD 72.000137
GNF 8656.000301
GTQ 7.718494
GYD 209.304005
HKD 7.75785
HNL 25.795011
HRK 6.696301
HTG 130.656987
HUF 362.387998
IDR 16841.85
ILS 3.75725
IMP 0.783049
INR 86.250981
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.501203
ISK 129.230436
JEP 0.783049
JMD 158.279683
JOD 0.708897
JPY 143.435008
KES 129.491881
KGS 87.44968
KHR 4014.999972
KMF 444.49797
KPW 900.013215
KRW 1454.310535
KWD 0.30705
KYD 0.833695
KZT 516.185248
LAK 21660.000055
LBP 89549.999868
LKR 297.161123
LRD 199.849977
LSL 19.450468
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.559783
MAD 9.474948
MDL 17.772781
MGA 4654.999827
MKD 54.630522
MMK 2099.267437
MNT 3510.035407
MOP 7.997093
MRU 39.74992
MUR 45.104736
MVR 15.398647
MWK 1735.99971
MXN 20.60751
MYR 4.436017
MZN 63.91013
NAD 19.435006
NGN 1589.497294
NIO 36.759839
NOK 10.78012
NPR 137.850796
NZD 1.738565
OMR 0.38499
PAB 1.000461
PEN 3.7325
PGK 4.07325
PHP 57.34197
PKR 280.650551
PLN 3.791451
PYG 8012.858136
QAR 3.640598
RON 4.419901
RSD 104.041973
RUB 83.498155
RWF 1415
SAR 3.753935
SBD 8.354365
SCR 14.328541
SDG 600.510487
SEK 9.832399
SGD 1.328135
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.779901
SLL 20969.501083
SOS 571.496279
SRD 36.93965
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.754108
SYP 13002.318778
SZL 19.450301
THB 33.830012
TJS 10.869722
TMT 3.5
TND 3.050989
TOP 2.342102
TRY 38.06059
TTD 6.792899
TWD 32.801895
TZS 2660.00032
UAH 41.452848
UGX 3686.748293
UYU 42.971431
UZS 12974.999808
VES 77.11805
VND 25765
VUV 126.180859
WST 2.884176
XAF 592.291578
XAG 0.032157
XAU 0.000314
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.742612
XOF 595.494418
XPF 108.649928
YER 245.302565
ZAR 19.48372
ZMK 9001.196219
ZMW 28.207027
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -7.7300

    60.27

    -12.83%

  • GSK

    -0.8800

    33.6

    -2.62%

  • NGG

    0.3800

    65.59

    +0.58%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    20.98

    -0.1%

  • CMSC

    -0.4500

    22.15

    -2.03%

  • SCS

    -0.4000

    10.21

    -3.92%

  • RIO

    -0.7400

    54.87

    -1.35%

  • BCC

    -3.7600

    94.68

    -3.97%

  • CMSD

    -0.5500

    22.2

    -2.48%

  • AZN

    -1.8900

    64.87

    -2.91%

  • RELX

    0.4800

    49.02

    +0.98%

  • JRI

    -0.2250

    11.765

    -1.91%

  • RYCEF

    -0.3400

    8.86

    -3.84%

  • BP

    -1.6700

    26.23

    -6.37%

  • BTI

    0.3400

    40.55

    +0.84%

  • VOD

    -0.1300

    8.45

    -1.54%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.