The China Mail - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672971
AFN 71.633316
ALL 90.15028
AMD 390.65139
ANG 1.790208
AOA 916.000208
ARS 1075.240199
AUD 1.66707
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.701669
BAM 1.785401
BBD 2.019937
BDT 121.550441
BGN 1.789833
BHD 0.376812
BIF 2925.5
BMD 1
BND 1.347806
BOB 6.928063
BRL 5.8915
BSD 1.000438
BTN 85.886692
BWP 14.071636
BYN 3.273951
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009521
CAD 1.419105
CDF 2871.000051
CHF 0.856399
CLF 0.025814
CLP 990.58005
CNY 7.3086
CNH 7.34782
COP 4391.18
CRC 507.659163
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 100.299613
CZK 23.086025
DJF 177.719747
DKK 6.822201
DOP 63.095264
DZD 133.792975
EGP 51.397403
ERN 15
ETB 129.706476
EUR 0.913845
FJD 2.340899
FKP 0.774458
GBP 0.783555
GEL 2.749641
GGP 0.774458
GHS 15.496707
GIP 0.774458
GMD 71.502648
GNF 8655.999865
GTQ 7.722082
GYD 209.932898
HKD 7.76814
HNL 25.750093
HRK 6.887702
HTG 130.908693
HUF 372.538
IDR 16867
ILS 3.77925
IMP 0.774458
INR 85.996951
IQD 1310
IRR 42100.000023
ISK 132.409665
JEP 0.774458
JMD 157.77438
JOD 0.708902
JPY 147.907978
KES 129.492558
KGS 86.8327
KHR 3962.000228
KMF 450.500861
KPW 900
KRW 1469.890341
KWD 0.30792
KYD 0.833797
KZT 524.446798
LAK 21660.00035
LBP 90798.310473
LKR 297.977032
LRD 199.499029
LSL 18.770322
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.540199
MAD 9.527504
MDL 17.747936
MGA 4659.999906
MKD 56.233434
MMK 2099.820881
MNT 3508.612
MOP 8.006117
MRU 39.849789
MUR 45.150026
MVR 15.392016
MWK 1735.496871
MXN 20.61894
MYR 4.480097
MZN 63.910048
NAD 18.769714
NGN 1566.00028
NIO 36.775017
NOK 10.97051
NPR 137.416643
NZD 1.802825
OMR 0.384992
PAB 1.000424
PEN 3.668501
PGK 4.06275
PHP 57.311976
PKR 280.601706
PLN 3.927985
PYG 8008.763722
QAR 3.641035
RON 4.547302
RSD 107.068038
RUB 86.147282
RWF 1416
SAR 3.754683
SBD 8.316332
SCR 14.887727
SDG 600.50089
SEK 10.07457
SGD 1.350705
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.750051
SLL 20969.501083
SOS 571.497124
SRD 36.664012
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.75364
SYP 13001.844432
SZL 18.770189
THB 34.746497
TJS 10.870498
TMT 3.5
TND 3.040495
TOP 2.342097
TRY 37.993803
TTD 6.779955
TWD 32.986502
TZS 2691.721959
UAH 41.052646
UGX 3718.140656
UYU 42.138319
UZS 12940.000067
VES 70.161515
VND 25800
VUV 122.117563
WST 2.799576
XAF 598.823272
XAG 0.033547
XAU 0.000337
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.744173
XOF 597.501522
XPF 108.299139
YER 245.649669
ZAR 19.581989
ZMK 9001.205864
ZMW 27.98795
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    1.0200

    69.02

    +1.48%

  • NGG

    -2.3000

    63.63

    -3.61%

  • RIO

    0.0670

    54.737

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    -0.1810

    22.109

    -0.82%

  • BTI

    -0.1750

    39.685

    -0.44%

  • RYCEF

    0.0100

    8.26

    +0.12%

  • VOD

    -0.1100

    8.39

    -1.31%

  • GSK

    -1.6500

    34.88

    -4.73%

  • AZN

    -2.5400

    65.92

    -3.85%

  • RELX

    -2.3600

    45.8

    -5.15%

  • SCS

    -0.3500

    10.23

    -3.42%

  • CMSD

    -0.2100

    22.62

    -0.93%

  • BCC

    -1.1700

    94.27

    -1.24%

  • BCE

    -0.5500

    22.16

    -2.48%

  • BP

    -0.9150

    27.465

    -3.33%

  • JRI

    -0.6350

    11.325

    -5.61%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.