The China Mail - Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

USD -
AED 3.673055
AFN 71.025985
ALL 86.762083
AMD 388.868144
ANG 1.80229
AOA 917.499262
ARS 1178.010402
AUD 1.56091
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.712043
BAM 1.71838
BBD 2.002943
BDT 121.466383
BGN 1.717302
BHD 0.376881
BIF 2973.281671
BMD 1
BND 1.309998
BOB 6.907549
BRL 5.656697
BSD 0.999671
BTN 85.150724
BWP 13.648225
BYN 3.271568
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008127
CAD 1.38458
CDF 2878.999894
CHF 0.825799
CLF 0.024563
CLP 942.679574
CNY 7.29497
CNH 7.27421
COP 4214.92
CRC 505.37044
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.878775
CZK 21.91245
DJF 178.021833
DKK 6.562602
DOP 58.910097
DZD 132.514004
EGP 50.821397
ERN 15
ETB 133.816329
EUR 0.879305
FJD 2.256901
FKP 0.746656
GBP 0.74725
GEL 2.740408
GGP 0.746656
GHS 14.295693
GIP 0.746656
GMD 70.99956
GNF 8658.598194
GTQ 7.699235
GYD 209.77442
HKD 7.75844
HNL 25.942636
HRK 6.622505
HTG 130.805895
HUF 355.189992
IDR 16758.4
ILS 3.62369
IMP 0.746656
INR 85.13525
IQD 1309.65194
IRR 42112.502706
ISK 128.459921
JEP 0.746656
JMD 158.360167
JOD 0.709194
JPY 142.708978
KES 129.249741
KGS 87.450231
KHR 4002.03836
KMF 432.498286
KPW 900.101764
KRW 1435.664999
KWD 0.30635
KYD 0.833088
KZT 511.373521
LAK 21623.212599
LBP 89572.429547
LKR 299.461858
LRD 199.942891
LSL 18.550298
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.469282
MAD 9.273348
MDL 17.204811
MGA 4511.608496
MKD 54.050136
MMK 2099.785163
MNT 3572.381038
MOP 7.988121
MRU 39.577741
MUR 45.145196
MVR 15.409902
MWK 1733.476838
MXN 19.603198
MYR 4.327498
MZN 64.00024
NAD 18.550298
NGN 1603.880054
NIO 36.786962
NOK 10.378669
NPR 136.24151
NZD 1.67981
OMR 0.384995
PAB 0.999671
PEN 3.665166
PGK 4.141754
PHP 56.096005
PKR 280.838623
PLN 3.755049
PYG 8005.869096
QAR 3.644463
RON 4.37683
RSD 102.971863
RUB 81.749252
RWF 1429.042107
SAR 3.751033
SBD 8.354312
SCR 14.388635
SDG 600.499605
SEK 9.639406
SGD 1.30959
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.701772
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.355773
SRD 36.850114
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.747337
SYP 13001.961096
SZL 18.543884
THB 33.438965
TJS 10.556725
TMT 3.5
TND 2.990428
TOP 2.342098
TRY 38.43845
TTD 6.782788
TWD 32.2745
TZS 2687.500947
UAH 41.532203
UGX 3663.759967
UYU 42.093703
UZS 12944.520346
VES 86.54691
VND 26005
VUV 121.306988
WST 2.770092
XAF 576.326032
XAG 0.030056
XAU 0.000302
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.715661
XOF 576.328564
XPF 104.781778
YER 245.102189
ZAR 18.544301
ZMK 9001.164141
ZMW 27.966701
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -0.4500

    63

    -0.71%

  • RYCEF

    0.0700

    10.25

    +0.68%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.27

    -0.22%

  • VOD

    0.0350

    9.605

    +0.36%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    9.9

    +0.4%

  • NGG

    0.2100

    73.06

    +0.29%

  • RIO

    0.1250

    60.995

    +0.2%

  • RELX

    0.1900

    53.55

    +0.35%

  • GSK

    0.4050

    38.465

    +1.05%

  • BTI

    0.1350

    42.525

    +0.32%

  • BP

    -0.6950

    28.435

    -2.44%

  • JRI

    0.0400

    12.84

    +0.31%

  • BCE

    0.2850

    22.095

    +1.29%

  • AZN

    0.6300

    70.56

    +0.89%

  • BCC

    -1.5950

    93.735

    -1.7%

  • CMSD

    -0.1200

    22.36

    -0.54%

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies
Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies / Photo: © AFP/File

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

Few will lose as much as journalists if Twitter dies, having grown reliant on its endless sources and instant updates despite the dangers and distortions that come with it.

Text size:

There has been fevered talk of the platform's imminent demise since billionaire Elon Musk took over last month and began firing vast numbers of staff.

But most journalists "can't leave," said Nic Newman, of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. "It's actually a really important part of their work."

Newman was working at the BBC when Twitter started making waves in 2008 and 2009.

"It was a new Rolodex, a new way of contacting people -- fantastic for case studies and... experts," he said.

But Twitter also became a competitor, replacing newsrooms as the source of breaking news for the public when terrorist attacks, natural disasters or any fast-moving story struck.

"Journalists realised they wouldn't always be the ones breaking the news and that their role was going to be different -- more about contextualising and verifying that news," said Newman.

It also meant journalists were tied to the platform for announcements by politicians and celebrities -- most famously the dreaded late-night and early-morning tweets from Donald Trump that left hundreds of journalists sleep-deprived throughout his presidency.

- 'Tribal melodrama' -

The dependency has bred many problems.

New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo spoke for many in 2019 when he wrote that "Twitter is ruining American journalism" with the way it "tugs journalists deeper into the rip currents of tribal melodrama, short-circuiting our better instincts in favor of mob- and bot-driven groupthink."

By rewarding the most vehement voices, the platform tends to drown out the majority of the population -- both moderates and non-elites.

"The debates that happen on Twitter are very much the debates of the elite," said Newman. "It has definitely been a problem in newsrooms."

"Paying attention only to Twitter tends to distort the way that many people, including journalists, see the world," agreed Mathew Ingram, digital media specialist at the Columbia Journalism Review.

Though he hopes they have grown savvy enough to deal with the distortions, journalists have been subjected to a "huge tide of disinformation and harassment".

But for all the frantic talk over Musk's volatile tenure, many believe the site will survive.

"For the record, I don't think it's all that likely that Twitter will shut down anytime soon," said Stephen Barnard, a sociologist at Butler University in the United States.

But he said journalists have good reason to fear its disappearance.

"They would lose access to what is for many a very large, powerful and diverse social network... (and) also a positive source of prestige and professional identity," Barnard said.

"There is no real heir apparent in that space, so I'm not sure where they would go," he added.

On the plus side, Ingram said, it could spur a return to "more traditional ways of researching and reporting".

"Perhaps that would be a good thing," he added.

T.Wu--ThChM