The China Mail - The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

USD -
AED 3.673035
AFN 70.749338
ALL 86.742549
AMD 388.618649
ANG 1.80229
AOA 917.503552
ARS 1178.036302
AUD 1.5583
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.693572
BAM 1.715765
BBD 2.010483
BDT 120.984297
BGN 1.716674
BHD 0.376929
BIF 2961.383932
BMD 1
BND 1.308314
BOB 6.895342
BRL 5.654699
BSD 0.995767
BTN 84.626755
BWP 13.650021
BYN 3.25865
BYR 19600
BZD 2.000132
CAD 1.386485
CDF 2878.999795
CHF 0.822803
CLF 0.024599
CLP 943.990026
CNY 7.294969
CNH 7.27219
COP 4217
CRC 503.44755
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.729199
CZK 21.889991
DJF 177.318683
DKK 6.554785
DOP 58.678527
DZD 132.477986
EGP 50.837803
ERN 15
ETB 133.284734
EUR 0.87805
FJD 2.255901
FKP 0.751089
GBP 0.745695
GEL 2.739981
GGP 0.751089
GHS 14.438109
GIP 0.751089
GMD 70.999723
GNF 8624.138113
GTQ 7.668858
GYD 208.325292
HKD 7.757335
HNL 25.813639
HRK 6.616898
HTG 130.287559
HUF 354.818008
IDR 16784.1
ILS 3.615501
IMP 0.751089
INR 85.215501
IQD 1304.412668
IRR 42112.49585
ISK 128.280536
JEP 0.751089
JMD 157.738448
JOD 0.7091
JPY 142.429502
KES 128.750082
KGS 87.450308
KHR 3986.174711
KMF 432.495472
KPW 900
KRW 1438.11009
KWD 0.30639
KYD 0.829897
KZT 510.667602
LAK 21537.476314
LBP 89218.19075
LKR 298.222682
LRD 199.142934
LSL 18.591041
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.447727
MAD 9.23274
MDL 17.057337
MGA 4428.361515
MKD 54.037794
MMK 2099.879226
MNT 3570.897913
MOP 7.955435
MRU 39.409969
MUR 45.211908
MVR 15.409863
MWK 1726.25392
MXN 19.606803
MYR 4.331004
MZN 63.999773
NAD 18.591041
NGN 1601.509791
NIO 36.642279
NOK 10.37457
NPR 135.401863
NZD 1.67871
OMR 0.385
PAB 0.995789
PEN 3.654268
PGK 4.123024
PHP 56.286498
PKR 279.80139
PLN 3.746427
PYG 7973.331579
QAR 3.629417
RON 4.371401
RSD 102.824809
RUB 82.651861
RWF 1404.653815
SAR 3.751546
SBD 8.354312
SCR 14.228001
SDG 600.501257
SEK 9.624505
SGD 1.308775
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.700483
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 569.072527
SRD 36.84997
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.713045
SYP 13001.925904
SZL 18.585433
THB 33.374012
TJS 10.504897
TMT 3.5
TND 2.969731
TOP 2.342098
TRY 38.44354
TTD 6.758369
TWD 32.2743
TZS 2682.503525
UAH 41.510977
UGX 3652.074743
UYU 41.923443
UZS 12902.008948
VES 86.54691
VND 25980
VUV 120.582173
WST 2.763983
XAF 575.438735
XAG 0.030332
XAU 0.000302
XCD 2.702549
XDR 0.715661
XOF 575.438735
XPF 104.623213
YER 245.101473
ZAR 18.55265
ZMK 9001.189445
ZMW 27.806215
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    60.8800

    60.88

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0600

    10.12

    -0.59%

  • RELX

    -0.1900

    53.36

    -0.36%

  • CMSC

    -0.0100

    22.32

    -0.04%

  • NGG

    0.8100

    72.85

    +1.11%

  • VOD

    0.2200

    9.57

    +2.3%

  • SCS

    -0.0300

    9.86

    -0.3%

  • RIO

    0.3100

    60.87

    +0.51%

  • BCC

    -0.1800

    95.33

    -0.19%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    22.48

    +0.09%

  • JRI

    0.0600

    12.8

    +0.47%

  • BCE

    0.1600

    21.81

    +0.73%

  • BTI

    0.3400

    42.39

    +0.8%

  • AZN

    0.3600

    69.93

    +0.51%

  • GSK

    0.6300

    38.06

    +1.66%

  • BP

    -0.0600

    29.13

    -0.21%

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst
The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst / Photo: © AFP/File

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

For thousands of years, predictions of apocalypse have borne little fruit. But with dangers rising from nuclear war and climate change, does the planet need to at least begin contemplating the worst?

Text size:

When the world rang in 2022, few would have expected the year to feature the US president speaking of the risk of doomsday, following Russia's threats to go nuclear in its invasion of Ukraine.

"We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis" in 1962, Joe Biden said in October.

And on the year that humanity welcomed its eighth billion member, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that the planet was on a "highway to climate hell."

In extremes widely attributed to climate change, floods submerged one-third of Pakistan, China sweat under an unprecedented 70-day heatwave and crops failed in the Horn of Africa, all while the world lagged behind on the UN-blessed goal of checking warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

- Biggest risk yet of nuclear war? -

The Global Challenges Foundation, a Swedish group that assesses catastrophic risks, warned in an annual report that the threat of nuclear weapons use was the greatest since 1945 when the United States destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in history's only atomic attacks.

The report warned that an all-out exchange of nuclear weapons, besides causing an enormous loss of life, would trigger clouds of dust that would obscure the sun, reducing the capacity to grow food and ushering in "a period of chaos and violence, during which most of the surviving world population would die from hunger."

Kennette Benedict, a lecturer at the University of Chicago who led the report's nuclear section, said risks were even greater than during the Cuban Missile Crisis as Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared less restrained by advisors.

While any Russian nuclear strike would likely involve small "tactical" weapons, experts fear a quick escalation if the United States responds.

"Then we're in a completely different ballgame," said Benedict, a senior advisor to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which in January will unveil its latest assessment of the "doomsday clock" set since 2021 at 100 seconds to midnight.

Amid the focus on Ukraine, US intelligence believes North Korea is ready for a seventh nuclear test, diplomacy has been at a standstill on Iran's contested nuclear work and tensions between India and Pakistan have remained at a low boil.

But Benedict also faulted the Biden administration's nuclear posture review which reserved the right for the United States to use nuclear weapons in "extreme circumstances."

"I think there's been a kind of steady erosion of the ability to manage nuclear weapons," she said.

- Charting worst-case climate risks -

UN experts estimated ahead of November talks in Egypt that the world was on track to warming of 2.1 to 2.9 C -- but some outside analysts put the figure well higher, with greenhouse gas emissions in 2021 again hitting a record despite pushes to renewable energy.

Luke Kemp, a Cambridge University expert on existential risks, said the possibility of higher warming was getting insufficient attention, which he blamed on the consensus culture of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and scientists' fears of being branded alarmist.

"There has been a strong incentive to err on the side of least drama," he said.

"What we really need are more complex assessments of how risks would cascade around the world."

Climate change could cause ripple effects on food, with multiple breadbasket regions failing, fueling hunger and eventually political unrest and conflict.

Kemp warned against extrapolating from a single year or event. But a research paper he co-authored noted that even a two-degree temperature rise would put the Earth in territory uncharted since the Ice Age.

Using a medium-high scenario on emissions and population growth, it found that two billion people by 2070 could live in areas with a mean temperature of 29 C (84.2 F), straining water resources -- including between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan.

- Cases for optimism -

The year, however, was not all grim. Vaccinations helped much of the world turn the page on Covid-19, which the World Health Organization estimated in May contributed to the deaths of 14.9 million people in 2020 and 2021.

The world has seen previous warnings of worst-case scenarios, from Thomas Malthus predicting in the 18th century that food production would not keep up with population growth to the 1968 US bestseller "The Population Bomb."

One of the most prominent current-day critics of pessimism is Harvard professor Steven Pinker, who has argued that violence has declined massively in the modern era.

Speaking after the Ukraine invasion, Pinker acknowledged Putin had brought back interstate war. But he said a failed invasion could also reinforce the positive trends.

Drawing a parallel, he said, "After the biblical Israelites abandoned human sacrifice, they kept having to take measures to prevent backsliding."

F.Brown--ThChM