The China Mail - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

USD -
AED 3.672974
AFN 71.999918
ALL 86.649901
AMD 390.940079
ANG 1.80229
AOA 917.504229
ARS 1123.784501
AUD 1.559099
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.696762
BAM 1.720686
BBD 2.017877
BDT 121.428069
BGN 1.721101
BHD 0.376901
BIF 2930
BMD 1
BND 1.312071
BOB 6.906563
BRL 5.806199
BSD 0.999437
BTN 85.314611
BWP 13.77569
BYN 3.270808
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007496
CAD 1.384295
CDF 2876.999843
CHF 0.809515
CLF 0.02506
CLP 961.650067
CNY 7.300189
CNH 7.293935
COP 4281
CRC 502.269848
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.424357
CZK 21.741504
DJF 177.719977
DKK 6.486499
DOP 60.447903
DZD 132.566
EGP 50.487202
ERN 15
ETB 133.023649
EUR 0.868585
FJD 2.283699
FKP 0.752396
GBP 0.74733
GEL 2.744976
GGP 0.752396
GHS 15.559683
GIP 0.752396
GMD 71.498252
GNF 8655.497181
GTQ 7.698128
GYD 209.656701
HKD 7.759297
HNL 25.849945
HRK 6.545098
HTG 130.419482
HUF 353.820304
IDR 16823.9
ILS 3.727028
IMP 0.752396
INR 85.15855
IQD 1310
IRR 42125.000012
ISK 125.98002
JEP 0.752396
JMD 157.965583
JOD 0.709301
JPY 140.908502
KES 129.496854
KGS 87.233499
KHR 4014.99986
KMF 433.491543
KPW 900
KRW 1422.59003
KWD 0.30663
KYD 0.832893
KZT 523.173564
LAK 21630.000205
LBP 89599.999887
LKR 298.915224
LRD 199.975027
LSL 18.856894
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.469804
MAD 9.275007
MDL 17.289555
MGA 4552.892736
MKD 54.091003
MMK 2099.693619
MNT 3567.319696
MOP 7.990393
MRU 39.435529
MUR 45.089852
MVR 15.399903
MWK 1735.99989
MXN 19.72658
MYR 4.4075
MZN 63.905032
NAD 18.856894
NGN 1604.649932
NIO 36.775056
NOK 10.369911
NPR 136.503202
NZD 1.66675
OMR 0.384998
PAB 0.999437
PEN 3.76305
PGK 4.133235
PHP 56.609802
PKR 280.605548
PLN 3.70875
PYG 7999.894426
QAR 3.640602
RON 4.324098
RSD 103.137317
RUB 81.166384
RWF 1415
SAR 3.752027
SBD 8.326764
SCR 14.241693
SDG 600.496433
SEK 9.52562
SGD 1.304201
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.774974
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.497632
SRD 37.150211
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745073
SYP 13001.857571
SZL 18.820228
THB 33.03014
TJS 10.733754
TMT 3.5
TND 2.987938
TOP 2.342097
TRY 38.204735
TTD 6.781391
TWD 32.4535
TZS 2687.502199
UAH 41.417687
UGX 3663.55798
UYU 41.913007
UZS 12914.999825
VES 80.85863
VND 25892.5
VUV 120.966311
WST 2.777003
XAF 577.111964
XAG 0.030597
XAU 0.000292
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.717698
XOF 574.999527
XPF 102.774998
YER 245.249983
ZAR 18.750292
ZMK 9001.202561
ZMW 28.458439
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.1400

    63.59

    +0.22%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2100

    9.29

    -2.26%

  • BCC

    -2.6700

    90.8

    -2.94%

  • CMSC

    -0.1100

    21.71

    -0.51%

  • BCE

    0.3400

    22.38

    +1.52%

  • NGG

    0.7900

    72.9

    +1.08%

  • SCS

    -0.3400

    9.42

    -3.61%

  • RIO

    0.3000

    58.47

    +0.51%

  • RELX

    -0.1300

    52.07

    -0.25%

  • CMSD

    -0.1400

    21.82

    -0.64%

  • JRI

    -0.2700

    12.13

    -2.23%

  • VOD

    -0.0800

    9.23

    -0.87%

  • BP

    -0.2400

    28.08

    -0.85%

  • GSK

    0.5200

    36.45

    +1.43%

  • AZN

    -0.6900

    66.9

    -1.03%

  • BTI

    0.1800

    42.55

    +0.42%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: © METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

E.Lau--ThChM