The China Mail - US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

USD -
AED 3.672995
AFN 71.499143
ALL 89.74485
AMD 391.009804
ANG 1.790208
AOA 916.495795
ARS 1075.754886
AUD 1.685725
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.673613
BAM 1.787694
BBD 2.01692
BDT 121.35421
BGN 1.784098
BHD 0.376948
BIF 2925.5
BMD 1
BND 1.349349
BOB 6.902572
BRL 6.014497
BSD 0.998862
BTN 86.097134
BWP 14.0993
BYN 3.269024
BYR 19600
BZD 2.006481
CAD 1.426735
CDF 2872.000397
CHF 0.845995
CLF 0.026094
CLP 1001.329764
CNY 7.339302
CNH 7.39964
COP 4424.25
CRC 512.832233
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 101.000057
CZK 22.951298
DJF 177.719882
DKK 6.80441
DOP 62.787821
DZD 133.541221
EGP 51.273201
ERN 15
ETB 129.949962
EUR 0.911365
FJD 2.35025
FKP 0.785678
GBP 0.782495
GEL 2.755027
GGP 0.785678
GHS 15.497748
GIP 0.785678
GMD 72.17057
GNF 8663.804194
GTQ 7.715806
GYD 209.409415
HKD 7.769405
HNL 25.628127
HRK 6.863498
HTG 131.583485
HUF 373.917226
IDR 16852.692308
ILS 3.79445
IMP 0.785678
INR 85.932969
IQD 1312.060987
IRR 42111.979176
ISK 132.744003
JEP 0.785678
JMD 157.736833
JOD 0.709026
JPY 145.593992
KES 129.511174
KGS 86.805951
KHR 4005.661669
KMF 450.692198
KPW 899.976479
KRW 1470.494017
KWD 0.307863
KYD 0.829268
KZT 521.040525
LAK 21690.770454
LBP 89906.628583
LKR 296.695051
LRD 200.280625
LSL 19.577283
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.934084
MAD 9.561565
MDL 17.754528
MGA 4633.203922
MKD 56.254848
MMK 2099.38476
MNT 3509.76811
MOP 8.002611
MRU 39.949261
MUR 45.080826
MVR 15.445222
MWK 1736.03677
MXN 20.880805
MYR 4.478796
MZN 63.817034
NAD 19.577283
NGN 1576.150318
NIO 36.838353
NOK 10.951765
NPR 137.557201
NZD 1.820118
OMR 0.384984
PAB 1
PEN 3.681492
PGK 4.055324
PHP 57.330483
PKR 280.729906
PLN 3.930989
PYG 8022.7182
QAR 3.640439
RON 4.560348
RSD 107.305119
RUB 86.162468
RWF 1430.455354
SAR 3.749883
SBD 8.500642
SCR 14.575794
SDG 600.12631
SEK 10.02396
SGD 1.35208
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.759713
SLL 20969.501083
SOS 574.116425
SRD 36.572442
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.749976
SYP 13001.558046
SZL 19.577283
THB 34.746653
TJS 10.871664
TMT 3.498288
TND 3.080342
TOP 2.406281
TRY 37.99725
TTD 6.783843
TWD 33.03309
TZS 2681.884327
UAH 41.206967
UGX 3696.64109
UYU 42.556096
UZS 12996.655465
VES 72.084089
VND 25793.538418
VUV 125.059451
WST 2.843211
XAF 600.922931
XAG 0.033717
XAU 0.000335
XCD 2.706586
XDR 0.749413
XOF 600.922931
XPF 109.319941
YER 245.795492
ZAR 19.76401
ZMK 9001.2015
ZMW 27.939123
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -7.7300

    60.27

    -12.83%

  • SCS

    -0.4600

    9.74

    -4.72%

  • GSK

    -0.7100

    34.13

    -2.08%

  • NGG

    -0.1600

    62.74

    -0.26%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    22.21

    +0.18%

  • AZN

    -0.8900

    64.9

    -1.37%

  • BTI

    0.1200

    39.55

    +0.3%

  • RIO

    -2.2400

    52.32

    -4.28%

  • RELX

    -0.2200

    45.31

    -0.49%

  • BP

    -1.0600

    26.11

    -4.06%

  • CMSD

    -0.1000

    22.38

    -0.45%

  • BCE

    -1.2100

    20.87

    -5.8%

  • RYCEF

    0.1500

    8.38

    +1.79%

  • BCC

    -1.9600

    89.93

    -2.18%

  • VOD

    -0.1600

    8.19

    -1.95%

  • JRI

    0.2100

    11.47

    +1.83%

US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning
US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

A divided US Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday in an environmental regulation case with potentially far-reaching implications for the Biden administration's fight against climate change.

Text size:

The case concerns the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants, which produce nearly 20 percent of the electricity in the United States.

As the Supreme Court was hearing arguments, the United Nations issued a landmark report containing dire warnings over climate change.

While the three liberal justices on the nine-member Supreme Court appeared largely to support arguments that the EPA was operating within its brief, several of the conservative justices appeared skeptical.

"This agency is doing greenhouse gas regulation," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the liberal members of the court. "This is in, you know, exactly in its wheelhouse."

Jacob Roth, arguing for The North America Coal Corp., said the EPA is going beyond its remit.

"The agency is asking questions like: Should we phase out the coal industry? Should we build more solar farms in this country? Should we restrict how consumers use electricity in order to bring down emissions?

"Those are not the types of questions we expect the agency to be answering," Roth said.

In 2007, the Supreme Court, by a narrow majority, ruled that the EPA has the power to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act of 1970.

In 2015, Democratic president Barack Obama unveiled his Clean Power Plan, which was intended to combat global warming by reducing carbon dioxide emissions from coal- and gas-burning plants and shifting energy production to clean sources such as solar and wind power.

The Clean Power Plan was blocked in the Supreme Court in 2016 and repealed by former Republican president Donald Trump, who replaced it with his own industry-friendly Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule.

Trump, a climate change skeptic hostile to government regulation of industry, also nominated three justices to the Supreme Court, giving conservatives a 6-3 majority.

- 'Constrain EPA authority' -

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia threw out Trump's ACE rule on the last day of his presidency, setting the stage for the case currently before the Supreme Court: West Virginia vs EPA.

West Virginia and several other coal-producing states asked the Supreme Court to intervene and define the powers of the EPA. The case has also been embraced by opponents of strong government regulatory authority.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing before the court for the Biden administration, said the justices should just wait until the EPA publishes its new rules.

"The DC Circuit's judgment leaves no EPA rule in effect," Prelogar said. "No federal regulation will occur until EPA completes its upcoming rulemaking.

"Petitioners aren't harmed by the status quo," she said. "Instead, what they seek from this court is a decision to constrain EPA authority in the upcoming rulemaking."

In its brief to the court, West Virginia accused the EPA of acting like "the country's central energy planning authority."

Justice Samuel Alito, one of the more conservative members of the court, questioned how far the EPA could go in regulating emissions.

"Is there any reason EPA couldn't force the adoption of a system for single family homes that is similar to what it has done, what it is claiming it can do, with respect to existing power plants?" Alito asked.

Prelogar, the solicitor general, replied that the EPA "has never listed homes as a source category and couldn't do so because they are far too diverse and differentiated."

UN experts, in the report issued Monday on the global impacts of climate change, said humanity is perilously close to missing its chance to secure a "liveable" future.

"The cumulative scientific evidence is unequivocal: Climate change is a threat to human wellbeing and planetary health," the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said.

Any further delay in global action to cut carbon pollution and prepare for impacts already in the pipeline "will miss a brief and rapidly closing window of opportunity to secure a liveable and sustainable future for all," the 195-nation IPCC warned.

The Supreme Court is expected to issue its decision in West Virginia vs EPA before June.

W.Tam--ThChM